RPA with AI

RPA vs AI agents: why your bots break (and how to avoid it)

Twinny Team · · 7 min read
A rigid gear versus an adaptable spark of artificial intelligence

If your operations team spends its days firefighting every time a vendor changes a screen, you know the problem with traditional RPA: it is fragile. And the numbers confirm it.

The problem with traditional RPA, in data

According to research from Ernst & Young and Deloitte, between 30% and 50% of initial RPA projects fail or fall short of expectations, mainly due to fragility, maintenance cost and the inability to handle exceptions. Figures of up to 45% of firms reporting weekly bot breakage have been cited, and between 70% and 75% of cost goes on implementation and ongoing support. Deloitte also estimates that only 3% of organizations have successfully scaled RPA.

How traditional RPA works

RPA records a sequence of steps — clicks, copy, paste — and repeats it. It is fast and cheap for stable tasks, but it does not understand what it does: if the button moves or an unforeseen case arrives, it fails. It is tied to fixed rules and selectors.

What changes with an AI agent

An AI agent does not follow a rigid script: it interprets the goal, reasons with context and decides the next step. When the process changes, it adapts instead of breaking. Gartner already talks of a "new era of agentic automation" in its 2026 predictions: agents that interpret unstructured data and execute decisions in real time.

  • RPA: ideal for repetitive, stable, high-volume tasks.
  • AI agents: ideal for processes with exceptions, decisions or unstructured documents.
  • Best of all: combine them. The agent orchestrates and reuses your RPA bots where they make sense.
Where traditional RPA breaks when the process changes, Twinny’s agents adapt.

A warning to avoid the other extreme

Agentic AI is not magic. Gartner itself forecasts that more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled before the end of 2027 due to escalating costs, unclear business value or inadequate risk controls. The lesson: start with a concrete process and a measurable business case, not with the technology.

You do not have to choose

Twinny automates any business process by combining RPA + AI in a single platform. It keeps your bots where they are efficient and puts AI where RPA fails, with a high ROI and European compliance by default. For the feature-by-feature comparison, see our RPA vs AI agents comparison.

Frequently asked questions

How many RPA projects fail?

According to EY and Deloitte, between 30% and 50% of initial RPA projects fail or fall short, mainly due to fragility and maintenance cost.

Can I reuse my RPA investment?

Yes. Twinny’s agents invoke your RPA bots as one more step within an AI-governed process.

When is RPA enough?

When the task is stable, repetitive and without exceptions. If there are changes or decisions, the AI agent is the better fit.

References

  1. EY / Deloitte — why RPA projects fail (roundup)
  2. Deloitte — scaling RPA
  3. Gartner — Predicts 2026: the new era of agentic automation
  4. Gartner — Hype Cycle for Agentic AI 2026

Want to see how much you could save in your case?

Calculate my ROI Book a demo

Orchestrate every channel
from one intelligent
layer.

In 30 minutes we'll show you how Twinny connects to your operation and starts delivering results from week 1.